19 Places to Hire Meta & TikTok Ads Managers: Compared and Reviewed

Finding the right Meta and TikTok ads manager can make or break your social media advertising strategy. With so many platforms claiming to connect you with top talent, how do you know which one delivers on its promises? This guide compares 19 different hiring options, weighing their strengths against their weaknesses so you can make an informed choice. Whether you prioritize cost, speed, quality, or flexibility, you’ll find honest assessments that help you identify the best fit for your specific needs.

Legiit
Legiit specializes in digital marketing services with a strong focus on social media advertising, making it a natural fit for businesses seeking Meta and TikTok ads managers. The platform vets its service providers and offers clear pricing structures, which removes much of the guesswork from the hiring process. You can review portfolios, read client feedback, and communicate directly with potential hires before committing.

One advantage over general freelance platforms is the niche focus. You’re not wading through thousands of unrelated profiles. The trade-off is a smaller talent pool compared to larger marketplaces, though many users find the quality more consistent. Legiit also provides dispute resolution and payment protection, which adds a layer of security that informal hiring channels lack.
Upwork
Upwork offers massive scale with thousands of ads managers available at any given time. You can filter by hourly rate, location, experience level, and client reviews, giving you granular control over your search. The platform’s escrow system protects both parties, and the time-tracking tools provide transparency for hourly contracts.

The downside is the sheer volume of applicants, which can make finding quality talent time-consuming. Many businesses report spending hours sifting through proposals, and price competition can drive rates artificially low, sometimes attracting less experienced professionals. Upwork’s fees also add up, taking a percentage from freelancers that may indirectly affect what you pay. For companies with clear requirements and time to vet candidates, it works well. For those wanting a faster, more curated experience, it may feel overwhelming.
Fiverr Pro
Fiverr Pro differs from standard Fiverr by hand-selecting experienced professionals who have been vetted by the platform. This means you’re looking at ads managers with proven track records rather than beginners testing the waters. The interface is straightforward, and you can often start projects quickly with pre-packaged service offerings.

The structured packages make budgeting simple, but they can also feel restrictive if your needs don’t fit neatly into the available tiers. Compared to platforms where you negotiate custom terms, Fiverr Pro offers less flexibility. The quality is generally higher than regular Fiverr, but you’ll pay a premium for that curation. It’s a solid middle ground between budget marketplaces and high-end agencies.
Mayple
Mayple takes a matchmaking approach, pairing businesses with ads managers based on industry experience and campaign goals. The platform pre-vets all professionals and claims to connect you with someone suited to your specific needs rather than making you search through profiles yourself. This can save considerable time if you’re not sure what to look for.

The trade-off is less control over the selection process. You’re trusting Mayple’s algorithm and team to make the right match, which works great when it’s accurate but can be frustrating if the fit isn’t right. Pricing tends to be higher than open marketplaces because you’re paying for the curation service. For businesses that value speed and guidance over hands-on vetting, Mayple offers a streamlined alternative.
Toptal
Toptal positions itself at the premium end of the market, accepting only the top 3% of applicants according to their screening process. If you need an ads manager with extensive experience and a proven ability to deliver results, Toptal’s rigorous vetting might justify the higher cost. The platform handles much of the matching process and offers trial periods to ensure compatibility.

The obvious drawback is price. Toptal professionals command top-tier rates, which may exceed what smaller businesses can afford. The approval process for clients can also be selective, meaning not every company qualifies to use the platform. Compared to more accessible marketplaces, Toptal is best suited for established businesses with substantial advertising budgets who need senior-level expertise.
Freelancer.com
Freelancer.com operates on a contest model where you can post your project and receive competitive bids from multiple ads managers. This creates price competition that can work in your favor, potentially landing you a good deal. The platform is global, giving you access to talent from regions with lower cost structures.

However, the race-to-the-bottom pricing can attract less qualified candidates, and sorting through dozens of bids requires time and judgment. Quality control is less stringent than curated platforms, placing more responsibility on you to verify credentials. The contest format works well for businesses comfortable evaluating proposals independently, but it may feel chaotic compared to platforms with more guided matching.
PeoplePerHour
PeoplePerHour focuses on European and UK-based freelancers, though it includes talent from other regions. The platform uses an AI matching system to suggest relevant ads managers based on your project description, and it offers both hourly and fixed-price arrangements. The interface is clean and relatively easy to navigate.

Compared to Upwork, the talent pool is smaller, which can be a pro or con depending on your perspective. Fewer options mean less time sorting through profiles, but you might miss out on specialists available elsewhere. The platform works particularly well for businesses operating in European time zones or those who prefer working with freelancers in similar regions. The fees are comparable to other marketplaces, making it a reasonable alternative worth considering.
Bark
Bark flips the typical marketplace model by having service providers come to you. You submit your requirements, and interested ads managers reach out with their pitches. This saves you the effort of searching and allows you to compare approaches side by side.

The downside is less control over who contacts you, and you may receive pitches from professionals outside your preferred criteria. Response quality varies, and you’ll need to filter through inquiries carefully. Bark works well for businesses that want to see how different ads managers would approach their specific challenge, but it requires patience and good judgment to separate strong candidates from generic responses.
Growth Collective
Growth Collective focuses specifically on marketing professionals, including ads managers with experience in paid social campaigns. The platform emphasizes quality over quantity, vetting members and facilitating introductions rather than operating as an open marketplace. This creates a more personalized experience compared to large, impersonal platforms.

The exclusivity means a smaller selection and potentially longer wait times to find the right match. Pricing reflects the specialized focus and tends toward the higher end. Growth Collective suits businesses that view hiring as a relationship-building process rather than a quick transaction. If you prefer a community-oriented approach with more hand-holding, this platform delivers that experience.
Contra
Contra differentiates itself by charging zero fees to freelancers, which theoretically means ads managers can offer more competitive rates since they’re not compensating for platform cuts. The interface is modern and portfolio-focused, making it easy to evaluate work samples visually.

The trade-off is a smaller user base compared to established marketplaces, which limits your options. Payment protection and dispute resolution are less developed than on platforms with more history and infrastructure. Contra works well for businesses comfortable with a leaner platform experience in exchange for potentially better rates and a more direct relationship with freelancers.
LinkedIn ProFinder
LinkedIn ProFinder leverages the professional network you already use, connecting you with ads managers who have established LinkedIn profiles and networks. This adds a layer of social proof since you can see mutual connections, recommendations, and a complete professional history beyond just a marketplace profile.

The service is less active than it once was, and availability varies by region. Compared to dedicated freelance platforms, ProFinder offers fewer search filters and matching tools. However, the LinkedIn integration makes background research easier, and reaching out feels more professional than through anonymous marketplace messages. It’s best used as a supplementary option rather than your primary search method.
We Work Remotely
We Work Remotely functions as a job board rather than a freelance marketplace, making it better suited for businesses looking to hire ads managers for ongoing, long-term positions rather than project-based work. You post a listing, and candidates apply directly, giving you full control over the hiring process.

The comparison here is between ownership and delegation. You handle all vetting, interviews, and negotiations yourself without platform intermediaries. This offers maximum control but requires more time investment. There’s no built-in payment protection or project management tools, so you’ll need to handle those aspects independently. For companies ready to bring someone onto the team rather than outsource specific campaigns, this approach makes sense.
Gun.io
Gun.io focuses on tech and digital marketing talent with a vetting process that screens for both skills and communication ability. The platform handles matching and provides some project management support, positioning itself between full-service agencies and hands-off marketplaces.

The middle-ground approach means you get more support than on open platforms but pay for that assistance through higher fees. Compared to doing everything yourself on a job board, Gun.io reduces your workload. Compared to pure marketplaces, you sacrifice some control over selection. The platform works well for businesses that want professional guidance without committing to an agency relationship.
Codeable
While Codeable started with a WordPress development focus, it has expanded to include digital marketing specialists, including ads managers who work with Meta and TikTok campaigns. The platform maintains strict quality standards and provides project management support throughout engagements.

The WordPress heritage means the platform still skews toward technical professionals, so you’ll find fewer pure marketing specialists compared to platforms built specifically for that purpose. Quality is consistently high, but the selection is narrower. If your ads management needs intersect with website optimization or technical implementation, Codeable offers a useful combination of skills under one roof.
Flexiple
Flexiple curates a network of freelance developers and marketers, vetting candidates through technical assessments and interviews. The platform handles matching based on your requirements and offers trial periods to ensure fit before long-term commitments.

Compared to open marketplaces, Flexiple offers more structure and quality assurance but less browsing freedom. You’re working with their selections rather than searching independently. Pricing reflects the curation, landing in the mid-to-high range. The platform suits businesses that value a managed process and are willing to pay for the reduction in hiring risk and time investment.
Guru
Guru operates similarly to Upwork but with a smaller user base and slightly different fee structure. The platform offers workrooms for project collaboration and a payment system called SafePay that holds funds until work is approved. You can search profiles, post jobs, and negotiate terms directly.

The smaller community means fewer options but potentially less competition for attention from quality ads managers. Interface and tools are comparable to other marketplaces, neither significantly better nor worse. Guru makes sense as a secondary platform to cast a wider net if your primary search hasn’t yielded results, or if you find specific professionals there whose portfolios match your needs.
99designs by Vista
99designs built its reputation on design contests but has expanded to include marketing services. The contest model lets you see multiple approaches to your ads strategy before selecting a winner, which can provide valuable perspective on different creative directions.

The contest format works better for creative deliverables than ongoing management, so this platform suits businesses looking for campaign concepts, ad creative, or strategy documents rather than long-term ads management relationships. Compared to hiring a single manager upfront, contests take longer and may cost more overall. The value lies in seeing diverse approaches, but for straightforward management needs, direct hiring is more efficient.
CloudPeeps
CloudPeeps focuses specifically on marketing, content, and social media professionals, making it more targeted than general freelance platforms. The community is smaller and more tightly curated, with an emphasis on building long-term relationships between businesses and freelancers.

The specialized focus means relevant results without wading through unrelated profiles, but the smaller size limits options. Pricing tends toward the professional tier rather than budget-friendly rates. CloudPeeps works well for businesses that want a community feel and value quality connections over vast selection. If you’ve been frustrated by the impersonal nature of large marketplaces, this offers a more intimate alternative.
Workana
Workana serves the Latin American market primarily, connecting businesses with freelancers across South and Central America. If you’re looking for Spanish or Portuguese-speaking ads managers or want to tap into cost-effective talent in these regions, Workana provides access that other platforms may lack.

The geographic focus is both the strength and limitation. You’ll find professionals familiar with Latin American markets and cultural contexts, which is valuable for campaigns targeting those audiences. However, if you need someone in a different time zone or with experience in other markets, the fit may be less ideal. Rates are generally lower than North American or European platforms, making Workana a strong option for budget-conscious businesses comfortable working across regions.

Each platform brings different strengths to the table, and the right choice depends on your specific priorities. If you value curation and specialization, platforms like Legiit, Mayple, or Toptal streamline the search at various price points. If you prefer maximum control and don’t mind investing time in vetting, open marketplaces like Upwork or Freelancer.com offer vast selection. For businesses seeking ongoing team members rather than project-based help, job boards provide a different path entirely. Consider what matters most in your situation: speed, cost, quality assurance, or selection breadth. The platform that aligns with those priorities will give you the best chance of finding an ads manager who can actually move your Meta and TikTok campaigns forward.